[NTG-context] Re: Optical scaling in Latin Modern

On Tue, 2023-08-15 at 18:22 +0200, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 8/15/2023 5:33 PM, Hamid,Idris wrote: > > > > so [\s!designsize=\s!auto] means there is no explicit call to lmroman8-regular etc.? Interesting.. > > > check the lfg file ... On that note, there seems to be an inconsistency in the

[NTG-context] Re: Optical scaling in Latin Modern

Ah, the goodies files.. Got it and thanks for the clarifications. Best wishes Idris -- Professor Idris Samawi Hamid Department of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 On Aug 15, 2023, 10:22 AM -0600, Hans Hagen , wrote: ** Caution: EXTERNAL Sender ** On 8/15/2023 5:33 PM,

[NTG-context] Re: Optical scaling in Latin Modern

On 8/15/2023 5:33 PM, Hamid,Idris wrote: so [\s!designsize=\s!auto] means there is no explicit call to lmroman8-regular etc.? Interesting.. check the lfg file ... Hans - Hans Hagen |

[NTG-context] Re: Optical scaling in Latin Modern

e 12pt roman %D bodyfont. -) > well, in type-imp-latinmodern.mkiv i can find 'designsize' ... you're > not relying on some gpt driven search machine are you? No just the search files feature in Notepad++ -) Ok, looking at type-imp-latinmodern.mkiv, under latin-modern-designsize, I see

[NTG-context] Re: Optical scaling in Latin Modern

On 8/15/2023 4:35 PM, Hamid,Idris wrote: But for sure ConTeXt used to load lmroman12-regular (or the computer-modern 12 pt) by default. So things have changed.. afaik mkiv always had modern as default an dnot the designsize typescript (after all, we only have math 10pt) well you can load

[NTG-context] Re: Optical scaling in Latin Modern

remember a very long time ago some experiments with typescripts for computer-modern opticals, before latin modern became default (it's all foggy now..) But for sure ConTeXt used to load lmroman12-regular (or the computer-modern 12 pt) by default. So things have changed.. > well you can load the

[NTG-context] Re: Optical scaling in Latin Modern

On 8/15/2023 3:56 PM, Hamid,Idris wrote: Dear gang, It seems that ConTeXt does not currently implement optical scaling for Latin Modern -- at least not by default. For example: === \startTEXpage[offset=1em] Test {\tfa Test} {\tfb Test} {\tfc Test} {\tfd Test} {\tfx Test} {\tfxx Test

[NTG-context] Optical scaling in Latin Modern

Dear gang, It seems that ConTeXt does not currently implement optical scaling for Latin Modern -- at least not by default. For example: === \startTEXpage[offset=1em] Test {\tfa Test} {\tfb Test} {\tfc Test} {\tfd Test} {\tfx Test} {\tfxx Test} \stopTEXpage === In the log we have

Re: [NTG-context] troubles with latin modern and mutool

Hi Pablo, Hi list, \filterpages made the job and saved me a lot of nerves, another ConTeXt great command! Many thanks for the tips, Damien Thiriet ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add

Re: [NTG-context] troubles with latin modern and mutool

On 3/23/20 12:12 PM, Damien Thiriet wrote: > Hello, > > I am facing some unexpected troubles while splitting my lessons to send > them to my pupils. > My idea was to use mutool draw to extract only the pages of my > presentations relevant to my lesson of the day. > Unfortunately, when I do for

[NTG-context] troubles with latin modern and mutool

Hello, I am facing some unexpected troubles while splitting my lessons to send them to my pupils. My idea was to use mutool draw to extract only the pages of my presentations relevant to my lesson of the day. Unfortunately, when I do for example mutool draw -o file-beginning.pdf file.pdf 2,5

[NTG-context] troubles with latin modern and mutool

As an addition to my mail. I tried poppler pdfseparate and pdfunite, but the resolution is too high and my extract is much eavier than the original file. As an alternative, Is there a way to compile just a part of a context file, keeping the whole toc? My college pupils will get lost if my 3) is

[NTG-context] Location of primes and strange latin modern font

Will the primes also get fixed? In the latest standalone (I downloaded it minutes ago), I get the attached result running the same test file. It seems that the primes are not yet fixed in mtx-context | current version: 2017.05.14 19:09 It requires, for example: \starttext Compare

Re: [NTG-context] Location of primes and strange latin modern font

On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 7:05 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 5/11/2017 8:35 PM, Mathias Schickel wrote: >>> >>> 2) The math font looks strange (or should I say different) in the >>> ConTeXt example. (Wrong size, scaled?) >> >> >> Yeah, this seems to be a bug in the current version. I

Re: [NTG-context] Location of primes and strange latin modern font

On 5/11/2017 8:35 PM, Mathias Schickel wrote: 2) The math font looks strange (or should I say different) in the ConTeXt example. (Wrong size, scaled?) Yeah, this seems to be a bug in the current version. I have observed that, too. Hans did recently add (due to my suggestion, so thanks again,

Re: [NTG-context] Location of primes and strange latin modern font

I posted this question on stack exchange >> (https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/369226/52406), and got the suggestion >> that it might be a bug, and therefore I post it here as well: >> >> I have a problem with typesetting derivatives (and latin modern) in >> ConT

Re: [NTG-context] Location of primes and strange latin modern font

re as well: > > I have a problem with typesetting derivatives (and latin modern) in > ConTeXt in latest standalone. > > Minimal example: > > \starttext > Compare $u_p''$ and $u''_p$ with $u''$ > \stoptext > > Please see the attached image for the output (here I

[NTG-context] Location of primes and strange latin modern font

Dear list, I posted this question on stack exchange (https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/369226/52406), and got the suggestion that it might be a bug, and therefore I post it here as well: I have a problem with typesetting derivatives (and latin modern) in ConTeXt in latest standalone. Minimal

Re: [NTG-context] Latin setupmathematics

> On 17 Jun 2016, at 06:20, Alan BRASLAU wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 01:02:48 +0200 > Hans Åberg wrote: > >> The idea is avoiding clashes between variables and constants, like >> this: >> >> \starttext >> >> \setupmathematics[default=normal] >>

Re: [NTG-context] Latin setupmathematics

On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 01:02:48 +0200 Hans Åberg wrote: > The idea is avoiding clashes between variables and constants, like > this: > > \starttext > > \setupmathematics[default=normal] > > $푒 = ∑_{푖=1}^∞ e^{i-푖}$ > > \setupmathematics[default=italic] > > $푒 = ∑_{푖=1}^∞

Re: [NTG-context] Latin setupmathematics

> On 16 Jun 2016, at 23:48, Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> wrote: > > On 6/16/2016 9:15 PM, Hans Åberg wrote: >> There were no responses from the consortium here, so it means that if one >> should stick to the Unicode model, where the upright styles are unified with &

Re: [NTG-context] Latin setupmathematics

keyboard map is a chore with so many math styles. well, law, week i heard about emoticons in different colors as well as gender so maybe some day we will have a math upright alphabet to distinguish it from regular latin Doubt it, but I am checking it out: http://unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/201

Re: [NTG-context] Latin setupmathematics

r math italic as long as there are no >>> efficient input methods. Designing ones own keyboard map is a chore with so >>> many math styles. >> >> well, law, week i heard about emoticons in different colors as well as >> gender so maybe some day we will have a math up

Re: [NTG-context] Latin setupmathematics

> On 16 May 2016, at 11:10, Hans Hagen wrote: > > On 5/16/2016 10:59 AM, Hans Åberg wrote: >> The TeX syntax is too loose to do input that is close to the input. For >> example, in math, if properly parsed, the "{…}” can often be replaced by the >> normal “(…)”, and the the

Re: [NTG-context] Latin setupmathematics

On 5/16/2016 10:59 AM, Hans Åberg wrote: On 16 May 2016, at 10:48, Hans Hagen wrote: interesting tex was flexible enough to survive many decades Other survivors are C, C++, Scheme. With TeX, change may start as with Lua, only some better syntax for text input. that

Re: [NTG-context] Latin setupmathematics

> On 16 May 2016, at 10:48, Hans Hagen wrote: >>> interesting tex was flexible enough to survive many decades >> >> Other survivors are C, C++, Scheme. With TeX, change may start as with Lua, >> only some better syntax for text input. > > that always depend on the content; for

Re: [NTG-context] Latin setupmathematics

On 5/16/2016 10:27 AM, Hans Åberg wrote: On 16 May 2016, at 01:00, Hans Hagen wrote: On 5/15/2016 11:55 PM, Hans Åberg wrote: On 15 May 2016, at 23:18, Hans Hagen wrote: but eventually typesetting will become a niche and end up in the arts but i will

Re: [NTG-context] Latin setupmathematics

> On 16 May 2016, at 01:00, Hans Hagen wrote: > > On 5/15/2016 11:55 PM, Hans Åberg wrote: >> >>> On 15 May 2016, at 23:18, Hans Hagen wrote: >>> > but eventually typesetting will become a niche and end up in the arts but > i will probably not live long

Re: [NTG-context] Latin setupmathematics

> On 15 May 2016, at 23:18, Hans Hagen wrote: > >>> but eventually typesetting will become a niche and end up in the arts but i >>> will probably not live long enough to see that happen >> >> From the point of computer language design, TeX is not very good. One of the >>

Re: [NTG-context] Latin setupmathematics

about emoticons in different colors as well as gender so maybe some day we will have a math upright alphabet to distinguish it from regular latin Doubt it, but I am checking it out: http://unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/2016-May/00363

Re: [NTG-context] Latin setupmathematics

eks ranges are the upright >> ones. But those ranges will be used for math italic as long as there are no >> efficient input methods. Designing ones own keyboard map is a chore with so >> many math styles. > > well, law, week i heard about emoticons in different colors as well as gender

Re: [NTG-context] Latin setupmathematics

regular latin Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl

Re: [NTG-context] Latin setupmathematics

> On 15 May 2016, at 20:06, Hans Hagen wrote: > > On 5/15/2016 7:28 PM, Hans Åberg wrote: >>> What do you mean with change by hand ... isn't that what context can do for >>> you? Operate on all those axes ... (\tf is the upright one). There are >>> extensive mapping mechanisms

Re: [NTG-context] Latin setupmathematics

s used and then gets set ... so default suits > well (something latin in the name just sounds weird) Well, you are the man. >>> i have no problem adding that (basically one can even go as far as >>> disabling every mapping assuming pure unicode input but i guess that use

Re: [NTG-context] Latin setupmathematics

On 5/15/2016 7:28 PM, Hans Åberg wrote: On 15 May 2016, at 19:12, Hans Hagen wrote: On 5/15/2016 6:36 PM, Hans Åberg wrote: On 15 May 2016, at 16:44, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: \appendtoks \rm \to \everymathematics Here is another variation:

Re: [NTG-context] Latin setupmathematics

On 5/15/2016 7:42 PM, Hans Åberg wrote: (where of course we default to default=italic) Yes, but perhaps another name than “default”. well, it is \mathdefault that is used and then gets set ... so default suits well (something latin in the name just sounds weird) i have no problem adding

Re: [NTG-context] Latin setupmathematics

> On 15 May 2016, at 15:37, Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> wrote: > > On 5/14/2016 7:11 PM, Hans Åberg wrote: >> In order to align with Unicode, \setupmathematics might have Latin shape >> options, as the Greek ‘lcgreek’ and ‘ucgreek', say ‘lclatin' and ‘uclatin', &g

Re: [NTG-context] Latin setupmathematics

> On 15 May 2016, at 19:08, Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> wrote: > > On 5/15/2016 4:28 PM, Hans Åberg wrote: >> >>> On 15 May 2016, at 15:37, Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> wrote: >>> >>> On 5/14/2016 7:11 PM, Hans Åberg wrote: >>>>

Re: [NTG-context] Latin setupmathematics

> On 15 May 2016, at 19:12, Hans Hagen wrote: > > On 5/15/2016 6:36 PM, Hans Åberg wrote: >> >>> On 15 May 2016, at 16:44, Wolfgang Schuster >>> wrote: >>> >>> \appendtoks \rm \to \everymathematics >> >> Here is another variation: using the

Re: [NTG-context] Latin setupmathematics

On 5/15/2016 6:36 PM, Hans Åberg wrote: On 15 May 2016, at 16:44, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: \appendtoks \rm \to \everymathematics Here is another variation: using the sans-serif math styles, combining with the suggestion in the “Nolimits” thread. It would save

Re: [NTG-context] Latin setupmathematics

On 5/15/2016 4:28 PM, Hans Åberg wrote: On 15 May 2016, at 15:37, Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> wrote: On 5/14/2016 7:11 PM, Hans Åberg wrote: In order to align with Unicode, \setupmathematics might have Latin shape options, as the Greek ‘lcgreek’ and ‘ucgreek', say ‘lclatin' and ‘u

Re: [NTG-context] Latin setupmathematics

> On 15 May 2016, at 16:44, Wolfgang Schuster > wrote: > > \appendtoks \rm \to \everymathematics Here is another variation: using the sans-serif math styles, combining with the suggestion in the “Nolimits” thread. It would save the effort having to change all

Re: [NTG-context] Latin setupmathematics

> On 15 May 2016, at 16:44, Wolfgang Schuster > wrote: > > \appendtoks \rm \to \everymathematics This does the trick. Here more carefully composed example, showing how tricky it is to use currently: \setupbodyfont[xits,10pt] \startformula \startalign I &=

Re: [NTG-context] Latin setupmathematics

Hans Åberg 15. Mai 2016 um 16:28 Traditionally constants are set in upright and variables in italic. So constants like “log” etc., are set in upright. It is not used rigorously because of past typographical limitations, but one might in principle do that, cf. the

Re: [NTG-context] Latin setupmathematics

> On 15 May 2016, at 15:37, Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> wrote: > > On 5/14/2016 7:11 PM, Hans Åberg wrote: >> In order to align with Unicode, \setupmathematics might have Latin shape >> options, as the Greek ‘lcgreek’ and ‘ucgreek', say ‘lclatin' and ‘uclatin', &g

Re: [NTG-context] Latin setupmathematics

On 5/14/2016 7:11 PM, Hans Åberg wrote: In order to align with Unicode, \setupmathematics might have Latin shape options, as the Greek ‘lcgreek’ and ‘ucgreek', say ‘lclatin' and ‘uclatin', both defaulting to ’italic’. Unicode added the Latin italic symbols to the Math Alphanumeric Symbols

[NTG-context] Latin setupmathematics

In order to align with Unicode, \setupmathematics might have Latin shape options, as the Greek ‘lcgreek’ and ‘ucgreek', say ‘lclatin' and ‘uclatin', both defaulting to ’italic’. Unicode added the Latin italic symbols to the Math Alphanumeric Symbols range, so the upright letters

[NTG-context] ANNOUNCEMENT: Arabic-Latin Modern Fixed

[This announcement is dedicated to the 110% recovery and return of our visionary and fearless leader Hans Hagen: Three cheers to you, Hans!!!] Dear gang, It's my pleasure to announce the release of Arabic-Latin Modern Fixed, a monospaced font that extends TeX-Gyre Latin Modern Mono 10

[NTG-context] Latin Modern and optical sizes in math

Dear list, is it possible to get the correct optical sizes of Latin Modern (or another math font) in formulae? I'm using the Selectfont mechanism. In the following example, the superscripts simply use the regular font. \definefontfamily [lm] [math] [Latin Modern Math] \setupbodyfont [lm

[NTG-context] Italic small capitals with Latin Modern font

How can I use Latin Modern italic small capitals? I have seen on a previous thread that small caps are separated in an other file for Latin Modern font and that one should load it to use them in italic, but there was no example given to achieve that. Minimal example: \starttext \it \sc \input

[NTG-context] buglet in latin modern

Hi, There is a buglet in lm mono 12pt: \starttext % 6 and 9 wrong in 12pt \def\TestMe#1{\setbox0\hbox{#1}\dontleavehmode\expanded{\box0: \the\wd0}\par} \definedfont[lmmono8-regular] \processcommalist[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0,{,}]\TestMe \definedfont[lmmono10-regular]

[NTG-context] Arabic and Latin hemistiches

/wiki/Caesura With the latest beta, run the attached file. The module m-hemistich.mkiv also has a demo inside. For Arabic, note the tatweel across columns (only manual for now). The separator option with \hemistiches is probably more useful for Latin and Greek classical literature etc where

Re: [NTG-context] Arabic and Latin hemistiches

is probably more useful for Latin and Greek classical literature etc where the separator occurs on every line; the \hemistichescaesura option is probably more useful for Arabic where there are only occasional connectors across columns. Could one of you kindly add a page with this info

Re: [NTG-context] Arabic and Latin hemistiches

On 8/30/2013 12:48 AM, J. R. Schmid wrote: Idris, that's awesome news - I would have never imagined for something like this to happen so quickly. Unfortunately, I can't get it to run (probably my own fault). So far I'd been working with TeXLive. Now to try this out, I installed ConTeXt

Re: [NTG-context] Arabic and Latin hemistiches

There seems to be something more fundamental wrong with my setup. When I do that, I get: ! I can't find file `m-hemistich.mkiv'. Isn't first-setup.bat --modules='m-hemistich' supposed to install the module? On 30 August 2013 02:10, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: On 8/30/2013 12:48 AM, J. R.

Re: [NTG-context] Arabic and Latin hemistiches

On Fri, 30 Aug 2013, J. R. Schmid wrote: There seems to be something more fundamental wrong with my setup. When I do that, I get: ! I can't find file `m-hemistich.mkiv'. Isn't first-setup.bat --modules='m-hemistich' supposed to install the module? From what I understand from Hans's message,

Re: [NTG-context] Arabic and Latin hemistiches

From what I understand from Hans's message, m-hemistich is part of the ConTeXt distribution, so you just need to update your distribution to install it (i.e., just run first-setup.bat) That's what I understood from the ConTeXt Standalone wiki page, and also why I'm so confused about this - my

Re: [NTG-context] Arabic and Latin hemistiches

On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 19:07:48 -0600, J. R. Schmid j...@weitnahbei.de wrote: That's what I understood from the ConTeXt Standalone wiki page, and also why I'm so confused about this - my Standalone installation is brand new, and I started it roughly 3 hours after Hans' post about the new

Re: [NTG-context] A bug in latin modern fonts?

instead of minus at x - 3. The problems arise in the current standalone, the latest stable one worked OK at least for the latin modern fonts. Janne Junnila On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Janne Junnila janne.junn...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! The following example seems to have some troubles

Re: [NTG-context] A bug in latin modern fonts?

On Sat, 4 Feb 2012, Janne Junnila wrote: On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Janne Junnila janne.junn...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! The following example seems to have some troubles with the latin modern fonts: \starttext The function $f \colon \reals \to \reals$ is given by $x \mapsto x - 3

Re: [NTG-context] A bug in latin modern fonts?

On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 12:49:41PM -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Sat, 4 Feb 2012, Janne Junnila wrote: On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Janne Junnila janne.junn...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! The following example seems to have some troubles with the latin modern fonts: \starttext

Re: [NTG-context] A bug in latin modern fonts?

On 4-2-2012 18:49, Aditya Mahajan wrote: 2. \colonequals is a bug in ConTeXt's definition. We should be using the glyph from the font anyways and falling back only if the glyph is missing. Ah, i messed that one up ... I'll fix it. But anyway, it looks like I have to start on making a a nice

Re: [NTG-context] A bug in latin modern fonts?

On Sat, 4 Feb 2012, Hans Hagen wrote: On 4-2-2012 18:49, Aditya Mahajan wrote: 2. \colonequals is a bug in ConTeXt's definition. We should be using the glyph from the font anyways and falling back only if the glyph is missing. Ah, i messed that one up ... I'll fix it. But anyway, it looks

[NTG-context] A bug in latin modern fonts?

Hi! The following example seems to have some troubles with the latin modern fonts: \starttext The function $f \colon \reals \to \reals$ is given by $x \mapsto x - 3$. \stoptext The colon is printed fine, but the blackboard bold Rs don't look correct. The \mapsto symbol is missing and there's

Re: [NTG-context] ⅛ not displayed in Latin Modern

Dear ConTeXt folks, Am Samstag, den 29.10.2011, 18:27 +0200 schrieb Paul Menzel: some fractions (input using Compose) are not displayed in the resulting PDF files. \starttext ⅛ ist $\frac18$. ½, ⅓, ¼, ⅕, ⅙, ⅛ \stoptext I guess this is a font

Re: [NTG-context] ⅛ not displayed in Latin Modern

Dear ConTeXt folks, I forgot to append the links. Am Samstag, den 29.10.2011, 23:12 +0200 schrieb Paul Menzel: Am Samstag, den 29.10.2011, 18:27 +0200 schrieb Paul Menzel: some fractions (input using Compose) are not displayed in the resulting PDF files. \starttext

[NTG-context] quotation marks for language latin

Hi all, Hans, in lang-def.mkiv (line 623) and and lang-ita.mkii (line 101), we have \installlanguage % the same as italian [\s!la] [\c!rightquote=\lowerrightsingleninequote, \c!rightquotation=\lowerrightdoubleninequote, ... This can't possibly be right (is there a language which has

Re: [NTG-context] quotation marks for language latin

, This can't possibly be right (is there a language which has “quote„ ?). I think the usual thing would be dutch has \installlanguage [\s!la] [\c!rightquotation=\upperrightdoubleninequote, \c!rightquote=\upperrightsingleninequote, what do those latin manuscripts in you office

Re: [NTG-context] quotation marks for language latin

=\upperrightdoubleninequote] I just had a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-English_usage_of_quotation_marks, and the only language which has lowerdoubleninequote on the right of the quotation is Hebrew, I assume because its RTL. what do those latin manuscripts in you office use

Re: [NTG-context] Serbian: Latin vs. Cyrillic

Datuma 11. srpnja 2010. 13:24 Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com je napisao/la: It would be great if ConTeXt supported: \mainlanguage    [serbian]    [script=latin | cyrillic] as well as \mainlanguage    [english]    [variant=american | british] etc. This is what

Re: [NTG-context] Serbian: Latin vs. Cyrillic

On 12-7-2010 4:00, Vedran Miletić wrote: Datuma 11. srpnja 2010. 13:24 Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com je napisao/la: It would be great if ConTeXt supported: \mainlanguage [serbian] [script=latin | cyrillic] as well as \mainlanguage [english] [variant=american

[NTG-context] Serbian: Latin vs. Cyrillic

2010/7/11 Vedran Miletić wrote: I could also add support for Serbian latin, but I have no idea how to add new language that will allow both latin and cyrilic. It would be great if ConTeXt supported: \mainlanguage [serbian] [script=latin | cyrillic] as well as \mainlanguage

[NTG-context] fonts with non latin file names

Hi, i have a problem when i use font which contain non ascii letters in the file name, e.g. the filename of the Hirganino fonts on Mac OS X are a mixture or japanese and latin letters but only the latin part is used to cache the font information. In the following example \definefontsynonym

Re: [NTG-context] bold small caps with latin modern

On Tue, Nov 18 2008, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: On Tue, Nov 18 2008, Yue Wang wrote: you should apply a font feature to bold font. This is nonsense, the smallcaps for latin modern are a separate font like they had been in computer modern, trying to access them with font feature is useless

Re: [NTG-context] bold small caps with latin modern

On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 9:20 AM, Peter Münster wrote: But there seems to be no possibility to use bitmap fonts in the minimals. Almost-on-purpose decision. (You can still add some binaries to minimals yourself.) Once, I've heard about workarounds, for example getting bold by double printing

Re: [NTG-context] bold small caps with latin modern

On Tue, Nov 18 2008, Yue Wang wrote: you should apply a font feature to bold font. Oh! Cool! Thank you, Yue, you really help! :-D Cheers, Peter -- http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/ ___ If your question is of interest

[NTG-context] bold small caps with latin modern

Hello Is it possible to get bold small caps with latin modern and MKIV, and if yes, how? I would like to get working this example file: \starttext \sc Normal and \bf bold Small Caps. \stoptext Thanks in advance for any help, Peter -- http://pmrb.free.fr/contact

Re: [NTG-context] bold small caps with latin modern

you should apply a font feature to bold font. On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 4:07 AM, Peter Münster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Is it possible to get bold small caps with latin modern and MKIV, and if yes, how? I would like to get working this example file: \starttext \sc Normal and \bf bold

[NTG-context] Fontfeatures and latin script

Hi Hans, why was 'script=latn' removed from the three predefined fontfeatures default, oldstyle and smallcaps. A lot of fonts (free and commercial) need these features to enable kerning, ligatures and other features. Regards, Wolfgang

Re: [NTG-context] Fontfeatures and latin script

Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Hi Hans, why was 'script=latn' removed from the three predefined fontfeatures default, oldstyle and smallcaps. A lot of fonts (free and commercial) need these features to enable kerning, ligatures and other features. The most important reason was that an

Re: [NTG-context] Mapping to SmallCaps for Latin Modern

Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Hi Hans, the mapping for the SmallCaps fonts from Latin Modern use the slanted version for upright and the upright version for slanted style. font-otf.tex: \definefontsynonym [LMRoman10-CapsRegular] [file:lmromancaps10-oblique] [features=default] % features

[NTG-context] Mapping to SmallCaps for Latin Modern

Hi Hans, the mapping for the SmallCaps fonts from Latin Modern use the slanted version for upright and the upright version for slanted style. font-otf.tex: \definefontsynonym [LMRoman10-CapsRegular] [file:lmromancaps10-oblique] [features=default] % features=smallcaps? \definefontsynonym

Re: [NTG-context] Latin Modern bug in lm-texnansi-os.enc

Hi, On the ConTeXT mailing list, Idris posted some messages because he was trying to use oldstyle numerals in the latest Latin Modern release, and was experiencing two pretty big problems: * really bad kerning around the oldstyle numerals We would be grateful if we could get more

Re: [NTG-context] Latin Modern bug in lm-texnansi-os.enc

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On the ConTeXT mailing list, Idris posted some messages because he was trying to use oldstyle numerals in the latest Latin Modern release, and was experiencing two pretty big problems: * really bad kerning around the oldstyle numerals We would

[NTG-context] Latin Modern bug in lm-texnansi-os.enc

Hi Jacko, On the ConTeXT mailing list, Idris posted some messages because he was trying to use oldstyle numerals in the latest Latin Modern release, and was experiencing two pretty big problems: * really bad kerning around the oldstyle numerals * pdftex generated errors for the typewriter

Re: [NTG-context] Latin Modern vs Ancient Greek module

with a font, it was necessary to invoke hanging punctuation before installing the font, say, by writing \usetypescript[serif,sans,mono,mm][hanging][normal] \setupalign[hz,hanging] \setupfootnotes[align={hz,hanging}] —which meant that Latin Modern had to be reinstalled

[NTG-context] Latin Modern vs Ancient Greek module

The problem is that I no longer seem to be able to produce footnotes when the bodyfont is Latin Modern and I am using the Thomas Schmitz’ ancientgreek module. The following works but only when the two lines installing the ancientgreek module are commented out. \usetypescript[lmodern

Re: [NTG-context] XeTeX and Latin Modern

As I ran into the same problem I followed your instructions ... running the ctxtools command doesn't resolve it I'm afraid. $ kpsewhich lm-math.map /usr/local/gwTeX/texmf.texlive/fonts/map/dvips/lm/lm-math.map You should try that with --engine=dvipdfm , because dvipdfmx will find different

Re: [NTG-context] XeTeX and Latin Modern

Oliver Buerschaper wrote: No, didn't copy anything. Should I've done that? I'm lost ... Yes, you should have. Same original thread, second message (I forgot to mention that in the original message) Taco ___ ntg-context mailing list

Re: [NTG-context] XeTeX and Latin Modern

Problem solved.. Thanks so much for all of your input!! Helin On 2/7/07, Oliver Buerschaper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, didn't copy anything. Should I've done that? I'm lost ... Yes, you should have. Same original thread, second message (I forgot to mention that in the original message)

Re: [NTG-context] XeTeX and Latin Modern

Hi Taco, I got a new problem after upgrading to the new ConTeXt. When I compile a document with the xetex engine, during the xdvipdfmx processing, I got the following message, and all the math symbols are missing: Please see this thread: http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/

Re: [NTG-context] XeTeX and Latin Modern

, and I've updated the Latin Modern package, run ctxtools, pretty much all that I can think of... Just couldn't fix it. Best, Helin On 2/6/07, Oliver Buerschaper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Taco, I got a new problem after upgrading to the new ConTeXt. When I compile a document

Re: [NTG-context] XeTeX and Latin Modern

Hi Taco, Thanks for the response. Unfortunately, I've already read the email, and I've updated the Latin Modern package, run ctxtools, pretty much all that I can think of... Just couldn't fix it. Best, Helin On 2/6/07, Oliver Buerschaper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Taco, I got a new problem

[NTG-context] XeTeX and Latin Modern

the latest Latin Modern. I tried to run ctxtools, after which nothing works any more... Any input will be appreciated. Thanks! Colin -- Helin (Colin) Gai Class of 2009, Duke University Box 96332 Durham, NC 27708 Phone: 919-943-6302 helin.gai at gmail.com hg9 at duke.edu

Re: [NTG-context] XeTeX and Latin Modern

Helin Gai wrote: Hi all, I got a new problem after upgrading to the new ConTeXt. When I compile a document with the xetex engine, during the xdvipdfmx processing, I got the following message, and all the math symbols are missing: Please see this thread:

Re: [NTG-context] t-greek module and Latin Modern

Hans— Here is another error message that appeared in compiling a file that re-installs Latin Modern and uses Thomas’ module for ancient Greek. references : unknown reference [][fnt:t:1] references : unknown reference [][fnt:f:1] ! Font \nullfont has only 7 fontdimen parameters

Re: [NTG-context] t-greek module and Latin Modern

, at 8:25 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: Alan Bowen wrote: *B.* If I *do* reinstall the Latin Modern, I get �Arithmetic overflow errors� when there is Greek in the footnotes. My code for this is: hwo does the error message look? (the metrics of cm and lm are the same but there may be additional

Re: [NTG-context] t-greek module and Latin Modern

Alan Bowen wrote: *B.* If I *do* reinstall the Latin Modern, I get �Arithmetic overflow errors� when there is Greek in the footnotes. My code for this is: hwo does the error message look? (the metrics of cm and lm are the same but there may be additional glyohs) Hans

[NTG-context] t-greek module and Latin Modern

Hans and all other font wizards—Thomas and I have been stumped by problem that arises when one re-installs Latin Modern (in order to get margin kerning) and uses the t-greek module. Thomas suspects that Latin Modern, being a "clone" of Computer Modern, comes in different design size

Re: [NTG-context] Spacing problem (mixing Chinese with Latin characters)

(lot of Latin characters, Chinese character + ; that there was a line break before the ;. seems that there is a problem with lookahead and testing i'll send you a quick hack Hans ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl

  1   2   >